INTERACTIVE METHODS OF PATRIOTIC EDUCATION FOR FUTURE NAVAL CADETS: INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31891/2308-4081/2021-11(1)-3Keywords:
patriotic education, navy, future naval specialist, interactivity, form, method, international dimensionsAbstract
The article deals with the scientific issue of using interactive methods in the system of patriotic education for future naval specialists in the context of foreign scholars’ views. It shows that given today’s historical and socio-economic conditions, it is vital to abandon excessive ideology and ideological monopoly, schematism and formalism in the educational process, implement more effective educational technologies and, most importantly, create a new system of forming patriots using interactive methods. The article proves that since interactive methods enhance pedagogical interaction, communication, exchange of activities and their diversity, they manage to improve the behaviour and activities of naval cadets towards patriotic education. It also indicates that the introduction of interactive and communicative forms of personality-oriented education in patriotic education of naval cadets mostly depends on the invariants of personality-oriented approach to the educational process. It is because naval students choose moral norms, values, lifestyles and thus acquire positive personal experience through their participation in such forms of learning. A prerequisite for fulfilling the goals of patriotic education is appropriate methodical training of university teachers. However, there are no original methods characteristic of especially patriotic education of students. One cannot develop students’ patriotic feelings, patriotic identity, spirituality, culture, independence, initiative, and sociality socialize with traditional methods only. In this regard, some scholars believe that interactive methods have proved to be most effective concerning patriotic education as interactivity enables interpersonal cognitive communication and interaction between all education stakeholders.
References
Alford, S. J. (2019). The project method of teaching. Sacramento: Creative Media Partners, LLC.
Bake, J.-I. (2006). The project method (Die Projektemethode). Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag.
Blommaert, J. (2004). Workshopping: professional vision practices and critique in discourse analysis. Gent: Academia Press.
Buehl, D. (2013). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Cunningham, S., & Hubbold, R. J. (2012). Interactive learning through visualization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Curren, R., & Dorn, Ch. (2018). Patriotic education in a global age. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Creme, P. (2003). Why can’t we allow students to be more creative? Teaching in Higher Education, 8 (2), 273–277.
Davies, I. (2017). Debates in history teaching (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Fairbrother, G. P. (2013). Patriotic education in a Chinese middle school. In W. O. Lee, D. L. Grossman, K. J. Kennedy, & G. P. Fairbrother (Eds.), Citizenship Education in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 157174). New York, NY: Springer-Science + Business Media.
Huang, Y.-M., Jeng, Y.-L., & Huang, T.-C. (2009). An educational mobile blogging system for supporting collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (2), 163–175.
Jia, J. (2012). Educational stages and interactive learning: from kindergarten to workplace training. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Lundvall, B.-A. (2010). National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press.
Merrill, J., & Merrill, K. (2020). The interACTIVE class: using technology to make learning more relevant and engaging in the elementary classroom. Del Mar, CA: Elevate Books Edu.
Osborn, A. (2012). Applied imagination principles and procedures of creative writing. Redditch: Read Books Ltd.
Peters, M. A. (2010). Foreword. In B. Haynes (Ed.), Patriotism and Citizenship Education (pp. ix-x). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rapoport, A. (2019). Competing frameworks: global and national in citizenship education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education: evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 54–65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ДІНА ДУДОВА
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.