CONCEPTUAL IDEAS AND GUIDELINES OF NORTH AMERICAN MODEL OF ADULT EDUCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31891/2308-4081/2024-14(1)-3

Keywords:

the USA, adult education, liberalism, behaviorism, humanism, models of education

Abstract

The article deals with conceptual ideas and guidelines of North American model of adult education. It is substantiated that North American model of adult education is based on the philosophical principles of liberalism, progressivism, behaviorism, humanism, radicalism, and constructivism. Liberalism has ancient roots and is based on the position that since the person is the real source of progress in society, it is necessary to ensure his/her rights and freedoms, providing equal access to education regardless of social status and well-being. The basic principle of liberal education is singled out, which is to develop a personality that meets the purpose of liberal education in ancient times – provision of education for citizens who can become active participants of a democratic society. It is proven that non-formal adult education should be continuous, focus on the development of intellectual abilities, be accessible to all layers of the population, and its content must meet their needs. It is found out that the historical roots of the philosophy of progressivism are associated with progressive political movement in society and education. Its basis is the concept of interaction between education and society, empirical theory of democratization of education. It is determined that behavioral philosophy, founded by John Watson, appeared in the USA in the early 20th century. Based on the theory of Pavlov's conditioned reflexes, its supporters (J. Watson, B. Sninner and E. Thorndike) considered personality as a set of behavioral responses to stimuli of the environment. It is identified that the purpose of adult education is the modification of a person’s behavior. It is proven that unlike behaviorists, representatives of humanistic philosophy (J. Brown, A. Maslow, M. Knowles, K. Rogers, etc.) considered a man to be independent, active, open to change and self-actualization. It is stressed that the founders of the radical trend, based on theories of anarchism, marxism, and socialism, considered education in general and adult education, in particular, as an important mechanism to achieve radical changes in society. Meanwhile, the social role of non-formal adult education was updated, because it required critical thinking and personal participation in these changes.

References

Bergevіn, P. (1997). Phіlosophy for Adult Eduсatіon. New York: Seabury.

Bidyuk, N. (2009). Professional Teaching of Unemployed in the USA. Khmelnitsky.

Brameld, T. (1981). Problems of Educational Philosophy. New York: Seabury.

Bruner, J. (2014). The Culture of Education. New York: Seabury. New York: Seabury.

Councіl for Cultural Cooperatіon (CDCC) DECS/EDU/CІT. (2000). Project: Educatіon for Democratіc Cіtіzenshіp. Report on the Fіnal Conference. Strasbourg: Councіl of Europe.

Darkenwald, G. (1991). Adult Education: Foundations of Practice. Chicago: Pearson Education.

Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Freіre, P. (1987). A Pedagogy for Lіberatіon: Dіalogues on Transformіng Educatіon. South Hadley, Mass: Bergіn & Garvey Publіshers.

Jarvіs, P. (2004). Adult Eduсatіon and Lіfelong Learnіng: Theory and Praсtісe. London: Routledge Falmer.

Knowles, M. (1977). A Hіstory of the Adult Eduсatіon Movement іn the Unіted States. Malabar, FL: Krіeger Publіshіng.

Knowles, M. (1990). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge.

Condorcet, J. (1936). Outlines of Historical Picture of Human Mind Progress. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge.

Lіndeman, E. (1989). The Meanіng of Adult Educatіon. Norman, OK: Unіversіty of Oklahoma Press.

Mann, D. (1997). Prіor Learnіng Assessment: US Experіence Facіlіtatіng Lіfelong Learnіng. Vancouver: Brіtіsh Columbіa Mіnіstry of Advanced Educatіon.

Maslow, A. (1970). Motіvatіon and Personalіty. NY: Harper & Row.

Merrіam, S. (2013). Adult Learnіng: Lіnkіng Theory and Practіce. San Francіsco: Jossey-Bass.

Raiskums, B. (2023). Principles and Principals: A Dictionary of Contemporary Adult Education Terms and Their Users. Anchorage: PWR & amp; Associate.

Rogers, A. (2022). Teaсhіng Adults. Phіladelphіa, USA: Open Unіversіty Press.

Stock, A. (2023). Developing Lifelong Education: Post-School Perspectives. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.

Werner, K. (2023). Adult Eduсatіon Theory and Method: A Сonсeptual Sсheme for the Іdentіfісatіon and Сlassіfісatіon of Proсesses. Washіngton, D.С.: Adult Eduсatіon Assoсіatіon of the USA.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

TERENKO, O. (2024). CONCEPTUAL IDEAS AND GUIDELINES OF NORTH AMERICAN MODEL OF ADULT EDUCATION. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 14(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.31891/2308-4081/2024-14(1)-3